Today, talking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that's normally employed for even ten per cent of its possible.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", when the individual has secured his wrist into the max following a dip and a couple of strokes, return immediately to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their main use, it's merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of this modern era that dates back to the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the category can boast, was already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist due to his fabric strap turned into a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other with no crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are just two of the first cases that show how - fiction or reality - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day that the brands when it came to describing their models began to use the phrase: "suitable for any occasion".
The 007 change, unfortunately also the legendary "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose role has been played by the Omega Seamaster for many years.
But beyond their actual use within this large family whose roots would simply deal with "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to dread even once you need to wash the palms.
But a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let us just mention the features and constructive philosophies of those references.
I've a long standing friend who's a professional diver and who, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - like that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to guarantee these performances:
Fantastic visibility during the dip
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate verification of the operation of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its movement, either quartz or mechanical
But the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches need to adhere to specific rules such as the ones described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal use, that which we know is the best, the best sub may be ultimately a watchable to offer features much milder and easier to manage.
I remember that in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (approximately best scuba diving watches 2015 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that is not so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours couldn't get more info even count to a screw-on crown better still if protected on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
Along with the security on the watertight status of this underwater timepieces?
Precisely for those who would never use them for specialist purposes the ideal is to have the ability to rely upon a device that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a clear condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the primary reason why even an abyssal super dive watch might have to be hurried into a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on very few models, which honestly I don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown tightly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver someplace safe, or obligatorily make a closing but basic check on the trimming of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen together a bit 'of problems linked to the time that has to satisfy the water, and given the necessary information, I reveal you that - at least to date - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I've split them into two classes. The order in which they appear does not signify any position.